Business Book Review

Monday, October 30, 2006

Offshore Outsourcing - Business Models, ROI and Best Practices - by Marcia Robinson and Ravi Kalakota - About the Authors

Introduction
PART I: OFFSHORE OUTSOURCING—AN OVERVIEW
PART II: OFFSHORE OUTSOURCING—THE BUSINESS PROCESS LANDSCAPE
PART III: OFFSHORE OUTSOURCING—STRATEGY AND EXECUTION
Remarks
Reading Suggestions & CONTENTS
About the Authors

About the Authors

Marcia Robinson, who is president of E-Business Strategies, has consulting experience in the area of customer relationship management, and has worked extensively in call center management, IT outsourcing, and service process reengineering. She also coauthored E-Business: Roadmap for Success, M-Business: The Race to Mobility, and Services Blueprint: Roadmap for Execution.

Ravi Kalakota, PhD, is the CEO of E-Business Strategies. He also coauthored the classic Frontiers of Electronic Commerce as well as Services Blueprint: Roadmap for Execution and the bestselling E-Business: Roadmap for Success.

For more information, please visit:www.mirvarpress.com

Offshore Outsourcing - Business Models, ROI and Best Practices - by Marcia Robinson and Ravi Kalakota - Reading Suggestions & CONTENTS

Introduction
PART I: OFFSHORE OUTSOURCING—AN OVERVIEW
PART II: OFFSHORE OUTSOURCING—THE BUSINESS PROCESS LANDSCAPE
PART III: OFFSHORE OUTSOURCING—STRATEGY AND EXECUTION
Remarks
Reading Suggestions & CONTENTS
About the Authors

Reading Suggestions

Reading Time: 20-22 Hours, 318 Pages in Book

Robinson and Kalakota note that they have attempted to structure the book so that whether you’re a novice, already fully engaged in offshore projects, or somewhere in between, you can easily find information that pertains to your particular situation. Thus, you can read Offshore Outsourcing in its entirety, or you can concentrate on specific sections (there are three), depending upon your need and level of knowledge. Reading guidelines can be found in “The Organization of This Book” (p. v).

If you decide to read the entire work (an approach we recommend), be forewarned that you will find a lot of repetition. Because each chapter is organized to stand alone, basic foundational material is carried over repeatedly and often cross-referenced. However, this reiteration is done in the most unobtrusive way possible so as not to impede your forward momentum. Moreover, the inclusion of formerly explored material is always relevant in that it rarely fails to provide new channels of action and/or understanding.

If you decide to read portions of the book only, we suggest that you definitely include the preface and “Final Thoughts on Offshore Outsourcing” (chapter 12), preferably as a unit, and before you read anything else. As a means of broadening your knowledge base, you should also try to examine as many of the case studies as possible. They are clearly identified and start in chapter 3. Finally, Robinson and Kalakota have compiled two very useful guides that are a must. In chapters 10 and 11, respectively, you will find a guide to the top offshore vendors for different business processes and one for the top eight offshore and nearshore countries that discusses the competitive advantages and challenges of each. If these two chapters are not included in your reading plans, we recommend that you at least note these guides for future reference, should the need arise.

CONTENTS

PART 1: WHY OFFSHORE OUTSOURCING?
Chapter 1: Offshore Outsourcing—the Next Wave
Chapter 2: Offshore Outsourcing Business Models
Chapter 3: The Business Process Offshoring Landscape

PART 2: OFFSHORE OUTSOURCING BEST PRACTICES
Chapter 4: Information Technology Offshore Outsourcing
Chapter 5: Customer Care Offshore Outsourcing
Chapter 6: Finance and Accounting Offshore Outsourcing
Chapter 7: Human Resources Offshore Outsourcing
Chapter 8: Transaction Processing Offshore Outsourcing

PART 3: OFFSHORING STRATEGY CREATION AND EXECUTION
Chapter 9: Creating Your Offshore Strategy
Chapter 10: The Vendor Decision
Chapter 11: The Location Decision
Chapter 12: Final Thoughts on Offshore Outsourcing

Offshore Outsourcing - Business Models, ROI and Best Practices - by Marcia Robinson and Ravi Kalakota - Remarks

Introduction
PART I: OFFSHORE OUTSOURCING—AN OVERVIEW
PART II: OFFSHORE OUTSOURCING—THE BUSINESS PROCESS LANDSCAPE
PART III: OFFSHORE OUTSOURCING—STRATEGY AND EXECUTION
Remarks
Reading Suggestions & CONTENTS
About the Authors

Remarks

Offshore outsourcing is today’s hot topic. As Robinson and Kalakota note, it is “… an unstoppable mega-trend. … profoundly affecting the competitive capabilities and hence the labor structures of all multinational corporations.” In its wake, continuing wage deflation is overloading an economy already burdened with high levels of consumer debt. More and more workers are being displaced. And, federal and state governments are hard-pressed to come up with any foolproof solutions to make the problem disappear.

Though the authors raise these issues, they make no attempt to explore or analyze them, fully or in passing, for that is not their purpose. Rather, they offer Offshore Outsourcing as a comprehensive guide to the practical application of this trend across all industries. Their premise is that offshoring is not a temporary management fad—that despite the present and future challenges it is imposing on the U.S. workforce, it is a long-term development that has emerged as both a strategic and a tactical tool for meeting new business realities. And, though this tool is hardly new (companies have been offshoring manufacturing for many years and reaping significant cost and productivity improvements), the offshoring of business processes is still in its infancy. Thus, there is still much uncharted territory, and this territory is full of new rules, tools, and business models.

Robinson and Kalakota present a clear and detailed schematic that delineates these rules, tools, and models, superbly filling in the blanks left by the many general and oversimplified discussions currently available. Their approach, based on extensive research, focuses on helping CEOs and senior management understand the specific skills and management practices required to integrate individual projects, as well as large-scale offshoring activities into a company’s overall strategy. Thus, customizable guidelines take into account unique business needs and different levels of readiness for change, and sort out the many business models available for offshore outsourcing. They detail how to make offshoring work in yet untapped areas of administrative, customer-care, and transactional processing. In addition to showing how to reduce costs, they also illustrate how to achieve a balance between managing people and improving performance. And, they shed light on the dangers that can derail an offshore initiative in the assessment of ROI and risk. Throughout, an impressive array of best-practice case studies demonstrates how to apply offshoring to diverse processes and tasks so as to maximize every aspect of the initiative.

Essentially, the book is organized to emphasize and explore three critical points for companies that (to their peril), lack a comprehensive understanding of the core concepts and practices behind offshore outsourcing (i.e., companies that may still view outsourcing as “a short-term fix for saving money and ‘getting rid’ of some noncore functions”): (1) Offshoring is becoming a “need-to-have” competency. (2) It is a tactical business decision with long-term implications. (3) It is no longer an unproven model. Thus, the book drives home the reality that offshoring projects are complicated processes that deserve serious consideration and a disciplined approach. With the consideration and approach Offshore Outsourcing provides, CEOs and senior management can arm themselves with the right tools to quickly lower operating costs, improve customer service, and generate sustainable growth.

Offshore Outsourcing - Business Models, ROI and Best Practices - by Marcia Robinson and Ravi Kalakota - PART III: OFFSHORE OUTSOURCING—STRATEGY AND...

Introduction
PART I: OFFSHORE OUTSOURCING—AN OVERVIEW
PART II: OFFSHORE OUTSOURCING—THE BUSINESS PROCESS LANDSCAPE
PART III: OFFSHORE OUTSOURCING—STRATEGY AND EXECUTION
Remarks
Reading Suggestions & CONTENTS
About the Authors

PART III: OFFSHORE OUTSOURCING—STRATEGY AND EXECUTION
“We anticipate that by utilizing automation and standardization, the transaction processing market will eventually become more specialized based on industry-specific knowledge. … Transaction processing, one of the leading success stories of offshore outsourcing, is definitely here to stay.”
“Offshore outsourcing can save time and money, but only if companies do it right. … Firms that jump on the offshore outsourcing bandwagon without paying attention to external planning... will struggle with their offshore projects.”
According to Robinson and Kalakota, the outcome of an offshore outsourcing project depends on two critical factors—the strategy selected and the discipline with which the strategy is implemented. Because a “let’s do something quickly mentality” is a recipe for disaster, the authors recommend a seven-step methodology for success that includes: (1) analyzing offshoring goals and setting strategy, (2) creating an offshore delivery model, (3) negotiating an offshore contract, (4) designing service level agreements, (5) managing the transition, (6) managing the relationship for maximum value, and (7) measuring performance improvement.

The first step in any offshoring initiative involves a definition of the objective, scope, and time frame of the project. Companies must determine why they are using this approach and what they hope to accomplish. They must analyze current costs and prioritize areas of functions that could be a match for outsourcing. For each opportunity, objectives, as well as hoped for benefits, must be clearly stated. They must decide what improvements are needed (and why) and how offshoring will affect operations and customers. And, beginning with the end state in mind, companies must determine what capabilities are required for aligning offshore operations with the business strategy.

Keeping the firm’s culture, customers, and employees in mind, management must determine what processes to send offshore, selecting them based on savings potential, labor attributes, interdependencies, and regulatory constraints. And, because it is impossible to improve the unknown, a gap analysis is needed as a means of defining current costs, quality metrics, and procedures for those processes deemed probable candidates for offshoring, At this point, the scope of the process can be defined so as to establish an appropriate baseline, outlining the current service delivery costs, service levels, and benchmarks, and serving as a guideline for the desired outcome. Finally, a well-researched financial model, which includes a cost-benefit analysis and clearly stated assumption, must also be developed.

In the second step, it must be decided which of the available business and delivery models can be employed to meet the stated objectives. Robinson and Kalakota note that the decision essentially comes down to building an operation (insourced or captive centers), buying into an existing operation (joint venture), or creating a sourcing relationship (outsource to a third party). As previously noted, each has its unique advantages, disadvantages, and challenges, depending upon a company’s objectives, experience with offshoring, and the type of processes tagged for outsourcing. Another critical factor is, of course, location. Because every location has a certain risk profile, each should be evaluated based on distance, time-zone differences, cultural differences, language barriers, quality of suppliers, legal framework, and geopolitical stability. In order to limit their exposure to any of these risks, many businesses take a multivendor, multisite, multicountry approach.

The final factor in the business model decision is the choice of vendor, which can be a tricky endeavor, given the relative infancy of the offshore industry. Thus, because the authors believe that the key to success is maintaining discipline throughout the decision process, they offer a useful vendor sourcing methodology that begins with identifying what type of vendor fits the needs of the proposed offshoring venture. The choice of either a transaction provider, a process provider, or a full-service provider is dependent upon how deep and broad management would like the relationship to be—whether it wants to offshore one well-defined task, several processes, or a total end-to-end process, and whether or not it is looking to reengineer any of its functions.

The next phase focuses on vendor selection. This procedure which, when well-organized, can take from six months to a year, involves: (1) identifying offshoring requirements and finding vendors that match those requirements; (2) preparing a request for information (RFI) questionnaire and sending it to selected vendors; (3) conducting an extensive evaluation of the returned RFIs to eliminate those that do not meet requirements; (4) selecting vendors for the request for proposal (RFP) process; (5) preparing an RFP that will facilitate assessment of each vendors performance, style, experience, people resources, process capabilities, and technology infrastructure; (6) evaluating responses so as to validate or invalidate information supplied about processes, financials, and the vendor’s record with its recent clients; (7) selecting the top vendor and visit the offshore facility to assess the company, people, processes, technology and infrastructure further; (8) performing a pilot project to assess project management and quality of work; and (9) finalizing the decision. The authors note that this entire procedure must begin with the critical first step of forming a core team that will participate in evaluating vendor responses and in negotiating the contract.

Once a vendor has been selected, contract negotiations begin, with the objective of creating a framework that specifies the general, financial, and legal aspects of the relationship, clearly defining all services and costs so that both parties have the same expectations. The master contract should reflect the company’s strategic view and critical goals, as well as the goals of the vendor. Thus, it should be flexible in time and scope so as to accommodate new risks and technologies. And, it should clearly define payment terms; document procedures for reporting and resolving conflict; spell out the duration of the contract and the terms under which it will expire or be renewed; define the scope and objective of the services to be provided, including a time line and deliverables; and detail performance measurements. The goal of the financial framework phase of contract negotiations is to ensure that the contract addresses approved cost parameters; thus, pricing, price stability, and hidden costs need to be discussed and agreed upon. Finally, the contract must address the critical legal issues: warranties, liability, confidentiality, protection of trade secrets and intellectual property, the security and privacy of data, local regulations, the possible failure of the vendor to perform agreed upon duties, and terminating the relationship.

Designing the service level agreement (SLA) is the next step. When well-designed, it describes the start and end dates for the service, defines the level of performance the vendor promises to deliver, the company’s rights if the vendor should fall short, the roles and responsibilities of both parties, the schedule for reviewing performance, and the documentation to be used in measuring the service.

Once the contract is signed, the real work begins; thus, smooth transition management (i.e., “the detailed, desk-level knowledge transfer and documentation of all relevant tasks, technologies, workflows, and functions”) is the next issue. Robinson and Kalakota note that the transition period is perhaps the most difficult stage of an offshoring project (taking from three months to a year) and involves such critical factors as knowledge transfer between organizations, communication management, and employee management (i.e, communicating who is to be redeployed, transferred, and/or let go, as well as why, how, and when).

In the midst of managing the transition, companies must also begin the sixth step of managing the relationship for maximum value. This is about more than monitoring the contractual obligations. It also involves an ongoing alignment of processes, projects, and goals with business requirements; making tactical decisions on program costs, project priorities and milestones, expected ROI, and risk management; and at the operational level, handling the day-to-day management of offshore projects to ensure that processes are running smoothly. This step establishes the framework for governing offshore outsourcing and overcomes the common misconception that once vendors are chosen and the transition is complete, the initiative will run on automatic pilot.

Because a disciplined, continuous improvement program is required for long-term success, measuring performance improvement (the seventh step) is an ongoing and critical responsibility. This phase of the offshoring project consists of the communication, monitoring (using well-defined audit controls), and reporting of SLA metrics, as well as continuous learning, via benchmarking and making changes as problems are discovered. At this point, a well-defined offshore outsourcing model should have emerged, along with a learning framework for ensuring that the overall strategy improves continuously.

* * *
Endnotes by chapter and a subject index are provided.

Offshore Outsourcing - Business Models, ROI and Best Practices - by Marcia Robinson and Ravi Kalakota - PART II: OFFSHORE OUTSOURCING—THE BUSINESS...

Introduction
PART I: OFFSHORE OUTSOURCING—AN OVERVIEW
PART II: OFFSHORE OUTSOURCING—THE BUSINESS PROCESS LANDSCAPE
PART III: OFFSHORE OUTSOURCING—STRATEGY AND EXECUTION
Remarks
Reading Suggestions & CONTENTS
About the Authors

PART II: OFFSHORE OUTSOURCING—THE BUSINESS PROCESS LANDSCAPE
“Offshore outsourcing has come a long way in a short time. Corporations largely understand traditional IT outsourcing and are beginning to get comfortable with more complex process outsourcing.”

“Thanks to the relentless pressure to cut costs, reduce capital outlays, and maximize operational efficiencies, we expect the demand for F&A offshoring to exceed that of many other processes for the foreseeable future.”
Robinson and Kalakota note that, according to Richard Swanson, director of BPO Services at Patni Computer Systems, “The services that are working best offshore are those that are labor intensive, well structured, repeatable, nonproprietary, and low risk to the business.” These services generally fall into seven broad categories: (1) information technology (IT), (2) customer care, (3) finance and accounting (F&A), (4) human resources (HR), (6) supply-chain management, and (7) manufacturing. The first five categories are the ones most widely outsourced, thus, they are the ones on which the authors focus their discussion.

Back in the mid-1980s, IT (hardware and software) companies were the first to move into the offshore sector, using offshore labor for low-end, lost-cost work, such as language localization, device and printer drivers, and motherboard production. Today, with the promise of better quality, cheaper resources, and faster development, more and more IT organizations are taking an increasing array of processes offshore. According to the authors, more than 200 of the Fortune 500 currently send some of their IT work to India. Of all the industries involved, however, the information-intensive financial services industry leads the business world in IT offshoring. And, it is expected that this offshore component will increase considerably over the next three years because the cost savings are just too compelling to ignore.

Presently, the range of possible IT processes that can be effectively offshored includes: (1) application development and maintenance—new feature and new application development, old release maintenance, and packaged application customization; (2) quality assurance—application and compatibility testing, regression analysis and bug testing, and test suite building; (3) IT support services—help desk support, problem resolution, remote diagnostics, documentation support, and application maintenance; (4) implementation services—product lifestyle management, consulting services, prototype development, technology evaluation, and application testing; (5) new product engineering—product applications, implementation services, version management, professional services, and documentation.

Multifunctional customer-service contact centers handle a wealth of scenarios from product ordering to processing email, resolving billing complaints, and chatting with customers online. Thus, these centers represent a $650 billion industry, employing 4 million people in the U.S. alone. Companies in many industries, including financial services, travel, retail, telecom, and media are racing to develop and implement an offshore strategy, for while the function is critical, the location is not.

Robinson and Kalakota have found that companies implement offshore customer care strategies for four primary reasons. First, of course, is cost. The average bundled costs for a U.S. call center agent are estimated to be approximately $34 per hour. In India, however, a call center can hire a new graduate, with a four-year degree, and with English and technical skills, for about $12 per hour. Flexibility is the second reason. Offshore providers can handle large volumes of incoming customer requests (voice and data) at peak times. Moreover, savings are a factor here as well, for staffing at peak times translates directly to costs. Quality is third. In many offshore locations, a highly educated labor force is readily available and a powerful advantage in improving overall service quality. Finally, one of the major challenges of contact centers is high turnover—bringing a new agent up to speed can take four to twelve weeks of costly training. Thus, better employee retention is the fourth reason for offshoring customer care.

Given these objectives, this BPO category offers a plethora of processes ripe for outsourcing: (1) support—customer service, billing query resolution, order taking, account activation, new customer registration, and complaints; (2) marketing—outbound and inbound email, telemarketing, surveys and poling, marketing campaign management, and customer win-back; (3) sales—inbound and outbound sales, Web chat and callback, and co-browsing processes; (4) technical support (often the first customer care process to go offshore)—data verification, application support, address updates, help desk, and problem resolution; (5) customer analytics—probability analysis, quality auditing, reporting, and complaint analysis.

Robinson and Kalakota note that because recording and reviewing every financial transaction is an enormous, time-consuming task, CFOs and managers have begun to outsource those financial activities they have identified as noncore. Cost, talent, availability, and technology are the drivers of this trend. Companies with performance metrics in place to measure their gains report significant savings from offshoring F&A (the cost ratio for an Indian accounting professional and a U.S. professional is 1:10). Another motive can be found in the fact that accounting talent is often in short supply in developed regions. Countries such as India, however, have an abundant supply of accountants, who obtain significant hands-on experience before becoming CPAs or CFAs; thus, they understand thoroughly the basics of financial management and GAAP accounting. In addition, the offshore F&A operating model can reposition the F&A support organization so that companies can move controllers from the purely transaction-centric processes and allow them to work actively with line managers to improve cash flow and profitability. Thus, outsourcing F&A is often part of an overall restructuring program to improve the quality of accounting operations.

The final driver of F&A offshoring is technology, or investment in single companywide software platforms. Such products as SAP R/3, Oracle, and PeopleSoft have helped in the reengineering of F&A processes, and this reengineering has led to more consolidated, streamlined workflows and the next phase of cost reductions.

Within the F&A process category, the authors have found that many subcategories can potentially be offshored. These include: (1) transaction processing—accounts payable and receivable, travel and expense reimbursement, payroll, and credit management; (2) general accounting—fixed asset accounting, general ledger, account reconciliations, and bookkeeping; (3) financial management—financial analysis, management and cost accounting, budgets and forecasts, capital planning, and cash management; (4) financial reporting—financial statements, consolidations/eliminations, variance analysis, statutory/external reporting, external audit support, and quarterly/annual reporting; and (5) tax processing—internal audit, unemployment, quarterly tax, federal tax returns, foreign exchange, and payroll taxes.

Robinson and Kalakota report that according to Fortune magazine’s Global 500 list for 2002, “Large corporations employed more than 47 million people, and the median number of employees for these corporations was approximately 63,000, in multiple locations and countries.” Obviously, an employee base of this magnitude presents enormous complexities for the human resources function: First, the function covers a large range of processes, from recruitment and retirement, to basic transactions and workforce development. Second, multiple HR groups exist for different business units. And, third, corporations lack central information repositories or integrated HR technology infrastructures. Simplifying this complex organizational structure and lowering the cost of providing employee services are the primary drivers of HR outsourcing.

As with other processes, HR contains many categories that can be offshored: (1) Compensation services—payroll, time and attendance, stock options, and payroll taxes; (2) benefits management—health benefits, 401(K), retirement plans, leave tracking, vacation schedules, and benefits termination; (3) employee relations—employee development, employee communication, record management, training administration, labor management, and learning solutions; (4) workforce management—selection, recruiting, relocations, performance review, and employee termination.

The final BPO considered is transaction processing. Organizations, in such industries as credit card, insurance, mortgage, retail banking, and telecommunications, face the tedious task of processing countless transactions (e.g., data entry of paper documents; processing of credit card applications, transfers, or payments; account reconciliation and records management; legal and medical transcription; document processing; and order processing). This critical, but time-consuming, task results in the need to generate, manage, and document data in an organized, accessible manner, forcing organizations to devote resources to activities that may not be core.

Thus, as an increasing number of companies seek to focus on their core business, improve service levels, and reduce implementation costs, offshore transaction processing is growing. Because this “low-level work” has few barriers to entry, and because better IT and communication infrastructures have enabled this work, many vendors specializing in this category are springing up in India, China, the Philippines, Malaysia, and Mexico.

The most popular types of transactions being handed off to these offshore vendors include: (1) mortgage processing—application processing, direct sales, credit scoring and approval, title verification, insurance tax, escrow processing, early collections calling, most of the customer service center functions, part of loan-service setup, post-closing documentation, manual payoff processing, account balancing, statement printing, and refinancing; (2) insurance claims processing—electronic information capture, information verification, eligibility determination, and reporting; (3) medical transcription—transcribing medical records from an audio format to a hard copy or electronic format; (4) content management—the processing of paper and electronic documents (newspapers, magazines, or journals) into searchable catalogs and archives.

Finally, for each of the five BPO categories, Robinson and Kalakota emphasize the importance of determining the scope of the project (i.e., determining what processes—should be retained and which processes should be sent offshore). Typically, if a process is a central contributor to the organization’s success—is a core competence—then that process probably is not a strong candidate for offshoring. However, managers must take care to not confuse core with critical. Critical functions can be outsourced as long as the right planning, oversight, and training are in place. Moreover, the authors note that more and more companies are pushing the boundaries in this regard. In F&A, for example, pioneers such as GE are moving beyond basic accounting transactions (a “commodity” process) and beginning to include budgeting, forecasting, strategy, and policy (i.e., the core “thinking” processes) in their offshore strategies.

Offshore Outsourcing - Business Models, ROI and Best Practices - by Marcia Robinson and Ravi Kalakota - PART I: OFFSHORE OUTSOURCING—AN OVERVIEW

Introduction
PART I: OFFSHORE OUTSOURCING—AN OVERVIEW
PART II: OFFSHORE OUTSOURCING—THE BUSINESS PROCESS LANDSCAPE
PART III: OFFSHORE OUTSOURCING—STRATEGY AND EXECUTION
Remarks
Reading Suggestions & CONTENTS
About the Authors

PART I: OFFSHORE OUTSOURCING—AN OVERVIEW
“Strategic and often gut-wrenching changes are taking place in corporations as offshore outsourcing becomes a viable alternative. Smart companies realize that if they don’t keep hunting for breakthrough cost innovations, some other organization will.”
“A crucial issue … is selecting the appropriate business model. Offshore business processes have a variety of organizational forms. … [And] the distribution of activities … may vary from one project to another depending on the effort involved, speed of execution, level of interaction, and the cultural and time zone differences.”

Because of continuous cost pressures on U.S. and European firms, offshore outsourcing, which Robinson and Kalakota define as “the delegation of administrative, engineering, research, development, or technical support processes to a third-party vendor in a lower-cost location,” is slowly but surely becoming an entrenched part of modern management. Transactions costs associated with finding vendors, sending work overseas, and monitoring this work are steadily plummeting, driven by: rapid declines in the expenses associated with communications and computing; dramatic improvements in Internet reliability and functionality: an increase in available offshore suppliers with better capabilities: an increase in high-quality onshore suppliers offering offshore services; better access to low cost, high quality workers, especially for labor-intensive tasks; and an offshoring business model that has been proven by such successful pioneers as GE and American Express.

The authors note that the Global 1000 (i.e., the big manufacturing multinationals) have been implementing offshore outsourcing for two decades, seeing rising productivity as a result and also realizing that the same advantages could be garnered from offshoring business-process outsourcing (BPO). Thus, the cost advantages realized by the Global 1000 have put tremendous pressure on competitors and suppliers, causing offshore outsourcing to surface rapidly as both a strategic and a tactical method of meeting new business demands. A successful strategy typically moves through the three broad phases of offshore entry, offshore development, and offshore integration. However, because most firms presently find themselves at the entry phase, Robinson and Kalakota focus their discussion on issues relevant to that stage. Those issues are concerned with determining the business model, selecting the location, defining expected results, and establishing a presence.

Every business model has two dimensions—ownership (or relationship structure) and geographic location of the work. And, within each dimension, varied and complex configurations are available. For example, three different general relationship arrangements exist for outsourcing engagements: pure contract offshore outsourcing (buy or third-party), joint ventures (partnership agreements), or fully owned captive subsidiaries (build it or insource).

Pure outsourcing is a make-versus-buy decision. With it, a company relinquishes control of a function to an external service provider in a foreign country, who takes over the function and does much of the work, using cheaper offshore labor. It is an approach that can lead to three different models. The first is selective outsourcing in which companies only send out a small subset of their business process activities. The second is transitional outsourcing, which occurs when a company temporarily hands over a function to a third-party vendor, but brings it back in-house later. With the third, total outsourcing, external vendors take over the business process and do whatever the original organization was doing, but for 20-30 percent less. In each case, the chief advantages include limited operational risk, a potential for cost savings, and rapid execution.

In a joint venture (JV), two or more companies pool their combined resources (thus, sharing expenses and workload) to create a new entity that implements a specific business project for a set period of time. However, as a business evolves, companies discover that it is better to build their own subsidiaries (i.e., captive offshore subsidiaries or foreign subsidiaries) to complete all the BPO work. This ownership model provides lower prices on a long-term basis, and provides more control and flexibility.

In terms of work location, there are three choices: onsite outsourcing, offsite outsourcing, and nearshore or offshore outsourcing. The onsite location model mandates that the third-party vendor utilize its own workforce to carry out all processes, from information gathering to implementation, at the client’s premises. Because this approach gives the client a greater degree of control, it is suitable for projects that are mission-critical, location sensitive, and that require constant attention. The offsite model is dependent upon the service provider having an office onshore so that, even if work is done offsite, it is still in the same country as the client. Thus, the offsite center may be used to provide support to an onsite team as a means of ensuring timely, quality service.

With nearshore or offshore outsourcing, the project-related activity is done at the vendor’s premises (For U.S.-based companies, nearshore is Canada or Mexico, while offshore would be such counties as India or the Philippines.), and offshore team members interact with the client via telephone, fax or email. This is model is high-risk (because of the communications problems inherent in the approach) and, thus, best suited for situations in which the project plan is well-defined and the development team has a clear understanding of client requirements.

From each combination of location and ownership structure, distinct business models and/or delivery mechanisms can be created in which the relationship between the client and provider is uniquely and appropriately structured for different levels of organizational maturity and complexity. These different structures include: the internal delivery (department-based) model; offsite onshore shared services; offshore captive shared services; cosourcing; offshore development centers; staff augmentation, contracting, or temporary, services; pure IT or BPO; and first-generation offshore outsourcing. In addition (as customer needs evolve), second-generation business models are emerging that tend to be more sophisticated and to span multiple models of the first generation. These combination models include the global delivery or blended outsourcing approach, hybrid delivery, the global shared services center, build-operate-transfer (BOT), and offshore multi-outsourcing (implemented by large global vendors, midsize and large offshore vendors, large multinationals, risk-averse corporations, and experienced multinationals, respectively).

In addition to understanding and choosing the right business model/mechanism, managers must also pay attention to the underlying revenue model. Robinson and Kalakota note that offshore outsourcing comes in two flavors: piecemeal task-oriented or comprehensive process-oriented. Whereas task-oriented BPO contracts tend to gravitate towards time and material (T&M) billing and fixed price, process-oriented contracts range from cost-plus to the more ambiguous examples.

T&M billing is the simplest pricing model and an attractive option when the scope, specification, and implementation plans of a project are difficult to define at the outset. Its challenge lies in adhering to very strict project management and reporting practices—any lax in oversight can make this approach very expensive.

The fixed-price (or fixed-time) option is suitable for customers with clear requirements and project schedules. Under this model, the customer pays a previously negotiated price, linked to well-defined deliverables, for the completed project. Moreover, changes in scope are subject to a predefined, fixed hourly rate, and must follow a prearranged change-request procedure. Thus, customers with clear requirements and project schedules are attracted to this approach because of the upfront commitment to a fixed time and because the risk is shared if cost or time overruns occur.

The cost-plus revenue model is typically used in combination with BOT, for complex, multiyear, multi-element arrangements, or with the dedicated development center (an extension of a company’s software engineering facility). These contracts, principally structured on a fee-for-service basis, stipulate that the vendor receives a fee that is no greater than the client’s historical operating costs. After vendors have recovered their costs, or achieved a negotiated minimum cost reduction, they may be required to share further savings with the client. Thus, the cost-plus revenue model is popular among large companies that seek long-term gains from their offshoring initiatives.

Because the goal of outsourcing is to help clients become more effective in their business operations, vendors that enter multiyear contracts favor risk-reward (or gain-sharing) performance-based models that tie payments to business performance. This approach is also known as value pricing, or “pay as you save,” in that the vendor builds first and is paid as savings materialize. Of course, the drawbacks are that revenue recognition becomes a critical accounting issue for the vendor.

Offshore Outsourcing - Business Models, ROI and Best Practices - by Marcia Robinson and Ravi Kalakota - Introduction

Introduction
PART I: OFFSHORE OUTSOURCING—AN OVERVIEW
PART II: OFFSHORE OUTSOURCING—THE BUSINESS PROCESS LANDSCAPE
PART III: OFFSHORE OUTSOURCING—STRATEGY AND EXECUTION
Remarks
Reading Suggestions & CONTENTS
About the Authors

Introduction


According to Robinson and Kalakota, most large corporations have cut costs as much as possible, using traditional methods. Understanding the “more for less” battle in which they are engaged, these firms realize that driving more costs out of operations means going offshore (i.e., migrating part or all of their value chains to low-cost locations). Offshore Outsourcing introduces CEOs and senior managers to the creation and implementation of offshore strategies that can be used effectively to create more focused, streamline, and competitive organizations.

Drawing on the experiences of GE, American Express, Dell, BellSouth, Delta Airlines, British Airways, and others, the authors provide a thorough overview of the offshoring landscape and define key concepts and trends. They provide a detailed analysis of the many different business processes available for offshoring, along with case studies that illustrate implementation challenges and the ROI that results from resolving them. And, they offer a how-to handbook that details the steps involved in creating and implementing clear, focused offshore strategies.

Book Review: The Third Opinion - by Saj-Nicole A. Joni, Ph.D. - About the Author

Introduction
LEADERSHIP HAS CHANGED
HABIT OF MIND
HABIT OF RELATIONSHIP
HABIT OF FOCUS
HOW INNER CIRCLE RELATIONSHIPS PROGRESS THROUGH THE STAGES OF LEADERSHIP
Remarks
Reading Suggestions & CONTENTS
About the Author

About the Author

Saj-Nicole A. Joni, Ph.D., is the founder of Cambridge International Group, Ltd., a high-level advisory services firm. She is widely regarded as one of the leading third-opinion advisers to executives around the world. She has more than twenty-five years of experience as a senior executive and adviser in global corporations and has served as an adviser in industries as varied as finance, high tech, energy, and health care. She lives in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

For more information, please visit:www.thethirdopinion.com

Book Review: The Third Opinion - by Saj-Nicole A. Joni, Ph.D. - Reading Suggestions & CONTENTS

Introduction
LEADERSHIP HAS CHANGED
HABIT OF MIND
HABIT OF RELATIONSHIP
HABIT OF FOCUS
HOW INNER CIRCLE RELATIONSHIPS PROGRESS THROUGH THE STAGES OF LEADERSHIP
Remarks
Reading Suggestions & CONTENTS
About the Author

Reading Suggestions

Reading Time: 5-6 hours, 211 pages in book

Together, the introduction and chapter 1 provide the background to Joni’s work as well as an overview of the entire book. Joni’s introduction is worth reading because it gives the reader a preview of the book’s direction. Chapter 2 provides an overview of the three Habits, with chapters 3, 4, and 5 being devoted to each of the Habits individually. Chapter 6 reviews the life cycle of inner circles, while chapters 7, 8, and 9 review each of the key stages, or levels, in a leadership career: early leader, key leader, and senior leader.

Reading the entire book (and many will be able to read the book in one sitting) is the best way to see the full, cumulative development of Joni’s concept. If, however, readers want a quicker method, we recommend they read through chapter 6 and then turn to Appendix II, which contains summary questions (taken from chapters 7, 8, and 9) for early, key, and senior leaders presented in bullet point form.

CONTENTS

Chapter 1: The Essence of Outside Insight
Chapter 2: The Three Habits
Chapter 3: Habit of Mind
Chapter 4: Habit of Relationship
Chapter 5: Habit of Focus
Chapter 6: The Life Cycle of Your Inner Circle
Chapter 7: Early Leaders
Chapter 8: Key Leaders
Chapter 9: Senior Leaders
Chapter 10: Conclusion: Greater Than Gold
Followed by two appendices

Book Review: The Third Opinion - by Saj-Nicole A. Joni, Ph.D. - Remarks

Introduction
LEADERSHIP HAS CHANGED
HABIT OF MIND
HABIT OF RELATIONSHIP
HABIT OF FOCUS
HOW INNER CIRCLE RELATIONSHIPS PROGRESS THROUGH THE STAGES OF LEADERSHIP
Remarks
Reading Suggestions & CONTENTS
About the Author

Remarks

In The Third Opinion, the author provides an insight into successful leadership that many leaders—perhaps even unconsciously—seek. Most successful leaders, regardless of industry, do not rise through the leadership ranks without, at some juncture, reaching for a third opinion, without asking for outside insight. However, most do not do it routinely, or as part of an integrated business practice or plan. What Joni offers is a method of leadership development that intimately incorporates using outside insight that is systematic, seamless, encompassing, not industry-specific, and which can begin at any time in a leader’s career, even at a senior level.

It is important, however, to distinguish the different roles played by advisers and thinking partners. The two terms are not interchangeable. Advisers are more commonly used throughout the corporate world, experts who engage in expert thinking with leaders. Thinking partners, on the other hand, have a broader role to play; they combine expert thinking within the broader realm of exponential thinking. It is truly the thinking partner who provides the third opinion. “As you think about it, you will notice that there are people who may be superb advisory resources who are not as talented in the thinking partner realm. To cultivate the right leadership inner circle for you, you will want to hone your ability to make this distinction.”

It is also important to note the distinction between thinking partners and executive coaches. Joni uses an analogy from the biological world to explain the relationship: an executive coach is one species within the genus of thinking partner. Executive coaches are, typically, a specialized group with expertise in interpersonal dynamics, communications, and organizational development, and most top executive coaches work with leaders on issues within these areas. Executive coaches also tend to work in the area of personal leadership (the philosophical and psychological aspects of leadership) rather than in results-driven strategy. Joni summarizes the distinction between executive coaches and thinking partner well when she asks readers, “Would you turn to a psychologist when what you really need is a Jack Welch?”

There are no set formulas. How leaders develop and calls upon their networks will reflect their own style and unique leadership. Perhaps it is this intangible quality that may present a challenge in creating an inner circle for many leaders not currently utilizing outside insight. The questions that Joni provides (which are as specific as possible while remaining applicable to all types of businesses and industries) for readers’ consideration will, however, are an aid in establishing leadership circles.

A circle is an appropriate metaphor to describe how to use outside insight for superior results. Beginning with the development of exponential thinking, a coil-like spiral develops to include Habit of Mind, which is linked to Habit of Relationship, which is then linked to Habit of Focus. Joni has observed that, “An underlying characteristic of exponential thinking is that insight shifts occur when problems are reframed and then explored at a higher level of context and complexity,” an observation that builds upon Donald Schön and Chris Argyris’ 1970s concept of “double loop learning.” In today’s world, “we are faced with multiple levels of potentially interdependent ‘double loops.’ Economics forms a loop with geopolitical realities. Markets loop with structural realignment, with discontinuities in science and technology, and with regulatory and oversight changes. Work-force issues loop with breakthroughs in communication infrastructure . . . Every leader faces these kind of interdependent loops. The successful ones know how to embrace them and find the connection.”

Book Review: The Third Opinion - by Saj-Nicole A. Joni, Ph.D. - HOW INNER CIRCLE RELATIONSHIPS PROGRESS THROUGH THE STAGES OF LEADERSHIP

Introduction
LEADERSHIP HAS CHANGED
HABIT OF MIND
HABIT OF RELATIONSHIP
HABIT OF FOCUS
HOW INNER CIRCLE RELATIONSHIPS PROGRESS THROUGH THE STAGES OF LEADERSHIP
Remarks
Reading Suggestions & CONTENTS
About the Author

HOW INNER CIRCLE RELATIONSHIPS PROGRESS THROUGH THE STAGES OF LEADERSHIP

The cumulative effect of developing your leadership circles grows over the lifetime of your career. Don’t wait until you are facing a crisis to start searching for confidants.

The issues of leadership, as well as the ways in which thinking partnerships are established, change over the leadership life cycle. All leaders, even very young ones, have some form of advisory network, though it may not be systematic. It may happen by accident, or as a result of basic networking. As leaders develop their skill, a more systematic advisory network begins to take shape as leaders begin to understand what they already have in place, and how that network is serving them.

Early leaders, as defined by the author, are those who are mastering the basics of their job responsibilities, understanding the dynamics of their organizations, and demonstrating their capabilities to lead business groups or units in delivering results, and who are managing approximately 20 to 50 people. Early leaders have two primary objectives: developing a few key advisory relationships to generate a third opinion on a regular basis, and laying the groundwork for their long-term leadership circles. In addition to seeking the expertise of others, in developing these key advisory relationships, early leaders will also be developing their capacity to think exponentially and to accelerate their professional development from the lessons of others. The early leader level is also the time to begin developing listening skills, and to listen and learn from others. Early leaders should ask themselves, “What is an effective way to listen and ask questions that might create a useful interchange of ideas?”

This is the time for building a base of relationships, and for cultivating a wide network of contacts both inside and outside the organization. It is also a time, according to Joni, to experiment with breadth by interacting with a broad a base of people in ways that are relevant to leaders’ challenges—and results. Early leaders must build a set of skills to use outside thinking. At this stage of their careers, the risks of advice and counsel from others are relatively low. Early leaders can begin by seeking out a few people on some specific issues. Joni suggests that early leaders explore what approach to thinking partners works for them, and to notice how they “calibrate and filter the insights and opinions of others.”

A critical objective at the beginning of building and using an advisory network is learning how to get results from insights. “Knowing what to do with what you learn is the difference between an academic exercise and truly powering up your leadership capacity,” Joni says. Moving from being someone who has lots of good ideas to someone who uses innovative ideas and solutions to get results is often the biggest factor in how quickly an early leader will move to being a key leader. The Star of Complexity Map is an excellent tool to help early leaders assess their opportunities as well as their needs. The Map can help early leaders invest in relationships that will support their current work, and create opportunities to build for the future.

Key leaders are those who lead strategic business units or divisions, manage multiple groups, and often have responsibility for P&L, for financial operations, and for metrics. As leaders transition from being early leaders to being key leaders, their choice of thinking partners becomes, in Joni’s opinion, a defining choice of their leadership. Key leaders build the four kinds of thinking partner conversations—visionary, sounding board, big picture, and expertise in inquiry—into the very fabric of their leadership. Key leaders must turn their full attention to developing their complete Habit of Mind. Joni cautions key leaders against relying too heavily on patterns of success from the early leader level. These patterns can limit, or even inhibit, success at the key leader level. “This is the point where you make fundamental choices about how much time you’ll devote to exploring new ideas. Or how much you will rely on inside information that can be tainted with filters and bias. Or how persistent you will be when making distinctions between urgent and important agendas.”

As key leaders develop their Habit of Mind, they come to understand that there has to be an appropriate creative tension between internal and external lines of sight; they understand that external resources do not replace internal capabilities, but instead support, and even spur, internal inquiry. It is at the key leader stage that the distinctions between inner circles and working circles become important. A move to the key leader level changes relationships, therefore key leaders must begin to put together an inner circle (both internal and external) that is focused on the most important areas of exponential inquiry, with whom the leader can share the highest levels of structural trust, as well as high personal and expertise trust. Most key leaders will find that their inner circles are composed of both formal and informal advisers, both retained and reciprocal advisers, and advisers that are both visible and invisible.

The goal of a key leader is to cultivate outside insight that can then be translated into results created and realized by teams of people. To accomplish this, key leaders create opportunities for interaction between their action teams and their thinking partners. There are two critical factors in building the connection between thinking partners and the rest of the organization: shaping and empowering the thinking partner in relation to the organization, and providing the thinking partner with the ability to work across the organization without being drawn into organizational dynamics. “The position of thinking partner is one of standing ‘next to,’ as opposed to getting more involved and standing ‘within’.” Finally, key leaders need to focus explicitly on inquiry and non-urgent important issues. They must make room for thinking time. Joni recommends reviewing the Star of Complexity Map regularly, and using it to identify gaps.

Moving into the ranks of senior leadership brings a new level of leadership challenges. Because senior leaders are often more isolated (the result of protection by executives and staff from the intense scrutiny of the public eye), they have a greater need than ever for their advisory networks. Senior leaders are charged with developing a cadre of people who are capable of thinking about long-term positioning and legacy. All senior leaders face legacy issues. These issues require them to think beyond their business to the impact of their ideas and actions on the people in their organizations, the future of their company, and the effects on communities. With senior leadership, leaders come full circle so that “the Habits of Mind, Relationship, and Focus of successful leaders drive the creation of powerful advisory networks, which in turn sustain these successful leaders in their quest to create extraordinary value and realize their full potential and that of their organizations.”

The life of a leader’s inner circle is, Joni says, ultimately about human relationships, how leaders develop and exercise their fullest capacities when they are pushed and guided by other great people. The legendary David Ogilivy has expressed this concept well: “If leaders surround themselves with people bigger than they are, we will have a company of giants; if leaders surround themselves with people smaller than they are, we will have a company of midgets.”

***
Endnotes by chapter and a subject index are provided.

Book Review: The Third Opinion - by Saj-Nicole A. Joni, Ph.D. - HABIT OF FOCUS

Introduction
LEADERSHIP HAS CHANGED
HABIT OF MIND
HABIT OF RELATIONSHIP
HABIT OF FOCUS
HOW INNER CIRCLE RELATIONSHIPS PROGRESS THROUGH THE STAGES OF LEADERSHIP
Remarks
Reading Suggestions & CONTENTS
About the Author

HABIT OF FOCUS

All leaders must master the Habit of Focus, which uses the Habit of Mind and the Habit of Relationship, to function effectively in their chaotic, high-pressure environment, while still making progress on the big-picture, long-term issues that need a leader’s attention. “Your sustained focus on the non-urgent important issues defines the core of your leadership. It is what ultimately differentiates your unique contributions and your ability to deliver value no one else can.” This means that leaders must devote what may be their most precious resource—their unscheduled time—to the important issues, the ones that hold the potential to yield the highest returns over time.

To begin developing a Habit of Focus, leaders “frame” their agendas. “Strategically framing issues—setting context, time frame, scope, and viewpoint—is work that is among the cornerstones of leadership.” Framing is inherently exponential. How leaders frame guides what they see. Beyond framing specific issues, leaders need to have a clear sense of what their overall leadership challenges look like.

Joni’s technique for accomplishing this is a graphical tool called The Star of Complexity Map, a technique that supports and guides the Habit of Focus. The Map enables leaders to take an integrated look at all the intersecting opportunities, challenges, and responsibilities they face—the entire leadership mandate—and looks at where leaders are supported or limited by expertise, exponential thinking, line of sight, and structural trust. “This allows you to see where you have strong and weak second opinions, and where getting the third opinion is most important,” according to Joni, who has used the Map with some of the world’s top executives. Using the Map, critical business issues, such as strategic positioning, revenue, profitability/cost structure, corporate investments/metrics, synergy with other business units, etc., are placed on a vector along a baseline of inherent business characteristics such as time frame, span, interdependence, stability, criticality, and rate of change, to get a comprehensive overview of the issues.

The Map can also be viewed through three “lenses.” “By sharpening the focus on different aspects of the star in aggregate, the lenses give a useful view of the issues in relation to resources and present knowledge.” A map can be generated by what is seen through each of the lenses: one for the leader (expertise, exponential thinking, time, and emotional energy), one for the internal team (expertise, exponential thinking, and structural trust), and one for the external network (expertise, exponential thinking, and structural trust). “The purpose of mapping structural trust is to reflect on the question of with whom, and on what topics, you are able to have full disclosure and confidential conversations, and where there are limitations and constraints.”

Book Review: The Third Opinion - by Saj-Nicole A. Joni, Ph.D. - HABIT OF RELATIONSHIP

Introduction
LEADERSHIP HAS CHANGED
HABIT OF MIND
HABIT OF RELATIONSHIP
HABIT OF FOCUS
HOW INNER CIRCLE RELATIONSHIPS PROGRESS THROUGH THE STAGES OF LEADERSHIP
Remarks
Reading Suggestions & CONTENTS
About the Author

HABIT OF RELATIONSHIP

The absence of high structural trust relationships is a critical hole in your leadership team.

The hardest part of leadership is to keep sustained focus on what is essential, not just what is urgent.

Leaders need to understand how they work with team members and with thinking partners—Habit of Relationship—to ensure that they undertake the right kind of thinking—Habit of Mind. Knowing oneself is the starting point. The next step is to build relationships that will support and sustain leadership—with trust. “Trust,” says Joni, “is an issue that leaders must regularly revisit. It is perhaps the central question of leadership, because leaders must work through others to achieve their goals.”

Early in their career, leaders need people that they can trust personally, i.e., that they feel comfortable talking with, and have confidence in, knowing that these people can do, and will do, their jobs well. The second kind of trust, and one that is needed particularly as managers advance into mid-level leadership roles, is expertise trust, i.e., trust in expert subject matter advice. As leaders rise through the ranks, they come to understand the degree to which they trust the expertise—the knowledge—of people with whom they work, regardless of the level of personal trust involved.

The third kind of trust is structural trust. Having structural trust in someone means having no doubt that the people that are chosen as thinking partners do not have, and will not have, competing agendas. As leaders progress up the ladder of corporate responsibility, their relationships with people, including those with whom they have shared personal and expertise trust, changes. In most companies, early in a leader’s career, there is little reason to be concerned with structural trust, but as Joni points out, as leaders advance into higher positions, people, for a myriad of purposes and reasons (to support their own goals, interests, etc.), will want to influence the leader’s thinking. Building a strong leadership circle means developing the ability to seek, and attract, people of high personal, expertise, and structural trust. A key idea that Joni elaborates in this regard is that while leaders can, and should, work with people with whom they share a medium level of structural trust, in their inner circle they must have some people with whom they share the highest levels of structural trust, as well as high personal and expertise trust.

Regardless of their industry, leaders find themselves involved in, and balancing, three categories of relationships: action vs. inquiry, internal vs. external, and working vs. inner circle. To create balanced, and ultimately powerful leadership, leaders must have action teams (those who carry out the day-to-day operations) as well as inquiry teams (those who help the leader think beyond the day-to-day operations, that think with them about direction, focus, and sustained growth). Many of the same people will populate both teams to drive results and performance. Leaders must also build internal and external relationships, both of which are required to truly think exponentially. “You can’t do the whole job without regularly thinking about unfiltered information . . . without vetting key ideas with people not invested in the perspective of your organization,” according to Joni. Developing a varied group of business and personal contacts will help leaders fill their inquiry teams.

Leaders’ working circles are made up of the people with whom they are in regular contact in the course of business; leaders’ inner circles will be developed over time as they rise through the ranks. The need for an inner circle comes into focus as leaders assume responsibility for large or broad corporate divisions, with responsibility over people who themselves have significant managerial responsibilities. Once leaders arrive at senior levels, the distinctions between working circles and inner circles become even more distinct. The most personal part of a leader’s advisory network will be the external inquiry inner circle team members—the part over which a leader has the most choice—and it will be the group that provides “uniquely powerful perspectives, freedom, trust, and wisdom. You turn to these people for your important third opinions.” This group of thinking partners is committed to, and capable of, acting without conflict of interests or divided loyalties. They are a leader’s peers (peers meaning those with an equivalent range of experience, ability, and judgment). “The external inquiry inner circle allows you to think the unthinkable in complete confidence, without fear of inadvertently setting events, and an avalanche of reactions, in motion before you are ready.”

Book Review: The Third Opinion - by Saj-Nicole A. Joni, Ph.D. - HABIT OF MIND

Introduction
LEADERSHIP HAS CHANGED
HABIT OF MIND
HABIT OF RELATIONSHIP
HABIT OF FOCUS
HOW INNER CIRCLE RELATIONSHIPS PROGRESS THROUGH THE STAGES OF LEADERSHIP
Remarks
Reading Suggestions & CONTENTS
About the Author

HABIT OF MIND

Today’s leaders must master, and then incorporate, a new level of thinking: exponential thinking. Exponential thinking allows a leader to see all sides of a complex issue. It is a way of thinking that looks for interrelationships, that explores assumptions, and asks questions that will, ultimately, reveal the full and true potential of a situation. Today’s leaders must not only think exponentially themselves, they must also develop, and lead, teams of people that think exponentially as well. Habit of Mind has three facets: 1) mastery of three levels of thinking (application, expert, and exponential thinking); 2) curiosity and self-knowledge; and 3) the ability to spot great talent for a leader’s inquiry team.

In application thinking, leaders use familiar, well-understood methods to generate results, a process with which virtually all managers are familiar. Along with application thinking, leaders also make use of expert thinking—understanding and expertise in specific fields of knowledge—when they are faced with issues, or challenges, that are new, or unique, and that do not appear to be easily solved by more familiar methods or processes. To round out their thinking, leaders will also need to think exponentially, to see all sides of complex issues. Inherent in the concept of exponential thinking is the need to engage with others who will bring different perspectives, and who can help leaders explore issues that may be presently outside of their awareness and understanding. In exponential thinking, leaders and their thinking partners are exploring interdependencies, understanding multiple perspectives, and validating assumptions. What occurs as a result of exponential thinking, according to Joni, is that “problems are reframed and then explored at a higher level of complexity.”

What does it take for leaders to think exponentially? It requires, first, an understanding of their “mental models.” These mental models include assumptions about how their business works, and beyond that, their more fundamental assumptions about the world, and their place in it. Karen Otazo, in Executive Coaching, points out that “we unconsciously filter the world through our own paradigms or worldviews and believe that what we see is the only reality.” A key part, then, of exponential thinking is uncovering and examining assumptions and how they affect thinking. A number of tools, or strategies, exist today to help uncover assumptions about business: a structured approach like Six Sigma, or on a broader scale, the Ladder of Inference developed by Chris Argyris, or the recent work of Charles Hampden-Turner designed to help leaders understand cross-cultural assumptions. Additionally, exponential thinking requires developing an ability to discern patterns, particularly the ability to recognize when a new element does not fit into existing patterns, but is significant enough to form the beginning of a new pattern.

Leaders who are exponential thinkers consider their mental models, patterns, and assumptions, and use them to develop a portfolio of scenarios for the future. As they are developing these capabilities to think exponentially, leaders should also consider how they obtain their information, who their sources are, and who their sources’ sources are. Particularly in large companies, as leaders become more senior, they often become more isolated. The information that comes to them is increasingly filtered, so that it is easy to lose sight of any perspective except that of their own team. Leaders need to, therefore, understand the limits of their lines of sight, and to develop relationships with others that will give them a portfolio of lines of sight. Likewise, the higher leaders progress through the ranks, the more it is their role to take that organization where it has not gone before. In doing that, leaders must be able to think in what Joni calls “the gray space, in that land where things are not clear and delineated, but rather, fuzzy and unpredictable.” In those “gray zones,” leaders are charged with discovering new realities, and making decisions that require using judgment in the face of many unknowns. Thinking partners can help leaders explore the “gray space” and help them build a portfolio of options for the future.

To lead in today’s business world, leaders need curiosity and self-knowledge. They must be open and inquisitive, aware of context, and of the convergence of circumstances that create opportunities, as well as challenges for their businesses. They understand underlying principles, and understand when these principles apply—or don’t apply. “While able to acknowledge success, they are as deeply interested in what didn’t work as they are in what did. They regularly inquire into their own ignorance, looking for their blind spots, and always work to push the boundaries of their knowledge.”

To develop Habit of Mind, it is also important for leaders to understand their managerial style. Understanding managerial style allows leaders to complement their own style with others in their inner circle to achieve the best possible results. It will also help leaders understand when they need to ask for a third opinion. Although it is important for leaders to be aware of their styles, strengths, and capabilities, it is just as important for them to develop the ability to evaluate others’ strengths, weaknesses, preferences, and biases. “Much has been written about the need for this skill when building great action teams. But it is just as important in building a leadership circle,” says Joni. Finally, to develop your own Habit of Mind, it is important to understand how other leaders, especially great leaders, develop themselves and their thinking.

Book Review: The Third Opinion - by Saj-Nicole A. Joni, Ph.D. - LEADERSHIP HAS CHANGED

Introduction
LEADERSHIP HAS CHANGED
HABIT OF MIND
HABIT OF RELATIONSHIP
HABIT OF FOCUS
HOW INNER CIRCLE RELATIONSHIPS PROGRESS THROUGH THE STAGES OF LEADERSHIP
Remarks
Reading Suggestions & CONTENTS
About the Author

LEADERSHIP HAS CHANGED

The risks to the organization—and the career—of the individual leader who is determined to go it alone are greater than ever. It is not enough to have a brilliant team of direct reports. Leadership in the modern era demands external thinking partners in addition to a top-notch internal team.

What makes it possible for the leaders you admire most to continue to grow—no matter how famous they are, or how insightful, or how often right?

In the twenty-first century, the requirements for successful leadership, according to Joni, have changed. Today, leaders face issues of previously unimagined complexity, uncertainty, and sensitivity, issues that require careful thinking and judgment, yet at lightning speed. The world operates in real time, or almost real time, with technology providing near-instant feedback. Similarly, technological and scientific innovations are occurring at an unprecedented rate. In their turn, these innovations foster disruptive change that transforms business in ways that are rarely predictable.

Globalization is now the norm in almost every industry, which means there is a much greater interdependence of products, services, and economies. Along with the geopolitical implications of globalization, there is also an increased amount of information to absorb in an increasingly networked world. In addition to new opportunities, globalization also brings with it new competition, as well as more mergers and acquisitions. Rapid change and globalization also bring with them new issues of trust—on all levels, personal, intraorganizational, and external—when companies face both cooperation and competition in the same environment. “The competitive landscape is continually being redrawn with temporary advantage shifting to a new competitor each time someone discovers how to exploit a new level of complexity in the offering.” Finally, in the wake of 9/11, the threat of terrorism and the resulting security concerns present issues that did not exist a decade ago.

Leaders find more complexity sooner, and more often, than leaders in the past. They will need to lead in areas in which they are not necessarily expert. And, leaders are regularly, as opposed to only rarely or occasionally, confronted with issues that are highly sensitive. Leaders, therefore, must have expert input and a “safe place to ask hard questions where they do not have to constantly filter for spin, self-interest, and other agendas.” Leadership, therefore, demands not only an excellent internal team, but external thinking partners as well. In this redefined world of business success, she poses two important questions that every business leader must ask: “What kind of leader do you have to be to deliver results and succeed today? What kind of team do you have to assemble to work with you in this new era?”

Working at many levels across diverse industries, Joni has observed that a few talented leaders know how to assemble their advisory network and incorporate it into their leadership team as a powerful and well-utilized resource. However, many promising leaders have not yet developed this resource. To accomplish this, they must develop three habits—the Habit of Mind, Relationship, and Focus—which will build a leadership circle and enable the leader, regardless of his or her level of leadership, to lead with the benefits of outside insight.

As leaders develop their three Habits, the conversations they will have with their thinking partners will fall, generally, into four categories. First, there will be visionary conversations, in which different possible futures are discussed, as well as how to use that insight in present situations. In these conversations, trends, such as micro- and macroeconomics, global and political realities, and scientific and technological innovations, and their effects may be discussed. Second, sounding board conversations will be of great value. In these conversations, leaders and their thinking partners can ask “what if?” by taking a new look at strategy or at supposedly implicit assumptions. Potential actions and decisions can be explored, as well as doubts that may have arisen in a leader’s mind. Third, thinking partners can help leaders with “big picture” conversations, by looking at everything that is happening, and making sure that the organization’s direction is aligned with all the various, and complex, elements that will be part of its actions and processes. Finally, thinking partners can help leaders engage in what Joni calls “expertise in inquiry” conversations. In these conversations, leaders and their thinking partners go a step beyond developing or deepening specific knowledge bases to developing fundamental models and new ways of thinking about the general business terrain.

Book Review: The Third Opinion - How Successful Leaders Use Outside Insight to Create Superior Results - by Saj-Nicole A. Joni, Ph.D. - Introduction

Introduction
LEADERSHIP HAS CHANGED
HABIT OF MIND
HABIT OF RELATIONSHIP
HABIT OF FOCUS
HOW INNER CIRCLE RELATIONSHIPS PROGRESS THROUGH THE STAGES OF LEADERSHIP
Remarks
Reading Suggestions & CONTENTS
About the Author

Introduction


What does it take to be a successful leader today? Besides the more obvious answers—commitment, intelligence, compassion, curiosity, and courage—there is one that is less obvious—the wisdom of others. Working with a circle of thinkers and advisers enables leaders to reach, and to sustain, peak performance. Such an advisory network offers more than just industry expertise; it assures a range and diversity of opinion, and the objectivity of an external perspective. Objectivity can only come as a result of a special kind of trust—structural trust. Those who provide that invaluable “third opinion” must have no need to advance their own self-interest.

From her own experience over more than twenty-five years as an adviser and thinking partner to business leaders around the globe, Saj-Nicole Joni, in order to fully understand the dynamics of leadership, and the role played by advisory networks, undertook a three-year research project in which she interviewed hundreds of executives and their thinking partners and advisers, to understand these issues in depth. That research project led to two major insights that form the core of The Third Opinion. First, leadership today requires three habits: Habit of Mind, Habit of Relationship, and Habit of Focus. Second, development of these habits can begin at any time in a leader’s career.